'Forced Camera Anti-Consumer' Says Sony

[PeterSilenced]

JoeTheBro said:

PeterSilenced said:

As far as dev kits they have said that their indie program will include all the tools for cloud,kinect xbox one development.

To be honest you are not giving me any choice but to compare both cameras  if its IN the games developed for it will according to you be easily ported so i am saying that porting will be an issue due to the ps4 camera being worst, the things that i pointed out that the ps4 camera can do just fine have not been announced by sony probably to avoid those *tiny letter*in the screen saying "items sold separetly".

The heartbeat in ps4 camera when it comes to horror games would be severely compromissed since no one wants to play dead space 4 in a well lit room.

Ok then. Imagine PS4's camera was 100% identical to Kinect v2. Do you still believe that Microsoft packing it in would make more sense than Sony leaving it as an option, at least as far as game support goes?

 Let me run a scenario 

So Xbox One+kinect=499 

Ps4+ps eye 499 (offer the option of either 399 without camera or 499 with camera)

The result is a fragmented install base much less appealing to 3rd parties or even sony themselves in turn less support for casuals and less innovation towards motion gaming as an actuall core way to play like if the camera is just there to say "OH hey we have one too"

I vow for the development of the industry as a whole not just core gaming so yes it makes more sense for MS to include it in everybox making games for defsblind and handicapp people more reasonable in the future and pleasing developers of every genre thus making the box All in one wich is since the beggining MS proposition. 

Does it make more sense in my opinion yes in your opinion maybe not but far FAR away from Anti-Consumer.