By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Seece said:
phinch1 said:
Seece said:
No it isn't ferel, if MS actually ate the cost I would say it was pro consumer, as it stands it isn't anything, it's just part of what the Xbox One is about.


I hate camera perhiperals with console gaming, a camera is not going to make my expirience with gta5 any better or call of duty,i bought a ps3 with no camera, the 360 with no kinect im buying a ps4 with no camera why should i pay abouit £80 more for xbox one with a camera.....i don't want the dam thing nor pay for it

and if your saying MS actually ate the cost and are taking a loss on it, id like to know what im paying extra for.........cause im not seing it

I'm not saying they are, I said IF they ate the coast it'd essentially be free so pro consumer. As it stands it is what it is.



it is what it is indeed, forced upson consumers, great for some who want to buy it and a nightmare for those who dont