'Forced Camera Anti-Consumer' Says Sony

[Seece]

phinch1 said:

Seece said:
No it isn't ferel, if MS actually ate the cost I would say it was pro consumer, as it stands it isn't anything, it's just part of what the Xbox One is about.

I hate camera perhiperals with console gaming, a camera is not going to make my expirience with gta5 any better or call of duty,i bought a ps3 with no camera, the 360 with no kinect im buying a ps4 with no camera why should i pay abouit £80 more for xbox one with a camera.....i don't want the dam thing nor pay for it

and if your saying MS actually ate the cost and are taking a loss on it, id like to know what im paying extra for.........cause im not seing it

I'm not saying they are, I said IF they ate the coast it'd essentially be free so pro consumer. As it stands it is what it is.