By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Augen said:
Google managed to find its dominance at the right time when search engines became more prevalent. I remember Yahoo was the big guy and plenty of competitors such a Lycos and Dogpile and others. Yet, Google overtook all of them because it offered faster, easier and more preferred search results. None of those managed to become synonymous with searching, yet people started saying "I Googled it".

Microsoft's big uphill fight is they think being as good as dominant company is good enough. It is not. Google has become habitual for many people that you would have to offer a great deal to get them to switch from it. Just the way it goes. If you think I am picking on one, Google itself has experienced this trying to challenge Facebook with Google+. On paper as good or even a little better, but people have gotten use to Facebook now.

This can change, but Microsoft needs to give people a reason to use Bing.


Lycos! lollll blast from the past man, showing your age maybe.

Ebay is another monopoly people used to say.  But what about Amazon.  Craigslist (Free).  Etc. 

Windows.  What about Apples OS.  Linux (Free). Etc.

Google.  But type in Bing.  Yahoo.  Etc.  

 

Bottom line is people choose to use those companies.  I would rather the government go after corrupt cartels like diamonds, oil, etc.  Then again, I would rather the government stay out of it completely.  You don't need any of the listed above to survive (maybe you can make a small case for oil).  This isn't a bread and water scenario (aka humanitarian) so keep the goverment out.