Lafiel on 30 September 2013
Mr Puggsly said:
No, he's saying there isn't significant difference between 900p and 1080p. He feels people can't really tell the difference. Perhaps he's right when you put on some of that anti-alising... antistropic filtering... and whatever else they do to hide jaggies. For example, I didn't even know GT5 was 1080p. Riddled with jaggies! |
900p means the image is more blurry and every form of post processing anti aliasing further blurs the image, so the difference between 900p and 1080p actually is quite visible, especially with higher aa (exception is fsaa, but fsaa means rendering in a higher res than display res, which ofcourse is the opposite of what is done here).
btw GT5 was 1280x1080p with vertical scaling and not full 1920x1080p
