Kaizar said:
Tom3k said:
Conina said:
Kaizar said:
And it's not 7 years old, the tech demo floating around on youtube is from 2006, but the 3DS is clearly not going to be using that model, when there is a 2010 & 2008 model. Even the model shown from 2008 that was more than twice as powerful. 2006 version could push 15.3 million polygons per second at 200mhz (400mhz max clock).
The one shown in 2008 could push 40.7 million polygons per second at half the rate, 100mhz. Clock speed is unimportant to say the least. Not that it matters though, because i'm not too impressed with Tegra anymore after seeing what the Pica200 can potentially do and DEFINITELY what the 3DS can do.
The 2008 model seems to be 600 MHz or so max clock frequency
While the 2010 model seems to be 1 GHz max clock
But what model do you think is used in the 3DS?
(models: 2006 & 2008 & 2010 & 2012)
And what do you think about everything else I've mention in the OP?
|
Can you provide some URLs for the 2008, 2010 and 2012 models of the Pica200?
Why aren't they to find on the dmprof-website?
http://www.dmprof.com/english/e_products/e_pica_200/
http://www.dmprof.com/e_news/e_press/372/
|
Because they only exist in Kaizar's looney world... The rest of us must be idiots, since we expect that actual manufacturer knows what he's producing.
|
But the PICA200 is a series. It's NOT just one GPU.
|
PICA is a series, PICA200 is a model. Seriously, it's all on manufacturers site, READ IT!
|
Kaizar said:
The ARM11 is said to be like 1 GHz 2 core which is better then the ARM9 268 MHz 2 core. The Vita has AMD arm vortex 9 or something like that which is confirm to be 1 GHz 4 core.
The problem with the Vita CPU is that it's AMD, so an advantage in cores & clock speed & newer model doesn't seem to be enough to do anything against a way weaker & older "intel CPU" with less cores, because the "intel" CPU will still process so much more LOL. So AMD CPUs are known as the least quality CPUs in the industry, which is probably why they are the cheapest 3rd party CPUs to use.
|
After this much nonsense I'm amazed there's a single person on this site that can actually take you seriously. You don't understand basic terms/technologies...
