Ashadian said:
FiliusDei said:
Ashadian said:
FiliusDei said:
Hahahahaha whar dumb article. Ryse was never a 60fps game and it was running on xbox one in e3. The difference was that is was 1080p then. But seeing how the game looks much better now at 900p, I think crytek made a good decision.
|
Yes it was running on x180, your right. They just toned the graphics down as they were too much for our eyes! They thought lets impress the xbox fans by going from looking 1080p 150k polygon counts and rock solid framerate to 900p 85k polygon count and less than solid framerate. It was proven with photos that E3 demos were running on PC's with Titan cards. But hey you can console yourself with the knowledge that it was actual X180 hardware and Crytek don't want you playing at such high settings! LMFAO
|
hahaha you must be a fanboy because your are blind. Do research, RYse, forza and KI were the only games running on x1 devkits at e3, all other games were running on pc. The game has better graphics with lower resolution now than it did at e3. Crytek made a good choice by lowerinf the resolution and polygons for better lightning and shaders.
I'm not even buying this game but your are a misinformed person.
|
You speaking about yourself? Can you provide the actual proof that any of those 3 games were running on X180 hardware??? Or are we gonna take a gaming sites so called word for it???? You obviously like to state the bleeding obvious don't you??? Obviously a game looks more polished further down the development line or do you think it works in reverse? Since the E3 build which was clearly PC Crytek have had time to improve textures,lighting and shading even though they have lowered resolution and polygon count. KI has gone from claimed 1080p 60FPS to 720P 60FPS. Clearly MS have been demonstrating on PC things like Titanfall and BF4.
|
Many peopoe at e3 saw the these 3 games running on xbox one. Believe what makes you feel better.
