Ryse: Old and New Builds Compared; 150,000 Polygons vs 85,000 and Better Shaders

[FiliusDei]

Ashadian said:

FiliusDei said:

Ashadian said:
http://wccftech.com/ryse-downgrades-show-real-power-xbox-one-ryse-ran-pc-e3/
Gone from E3 running on PC at 1080p 60FPS to X180 running at 900p 30FPS.
So if a graphics specialist company like Crytek who specialize in IQ are struggling then what about the average company????? MS the veil is lifting

Hahahahaha whar dumb article. Ryse was never a 60fps game and it was running on xbox one in e3. The difference was that is was 1080p then. But seeing how the game looks much better now at 900p, I think crytek made a good decision.

Yes it was running on x180, your right. They just toned the graphics down as they were too much for our eyes! They thought lets impress the xbox fans by going from looking 1080p 150k polygon counts and rock solid framerate to 900p 85k polygon count and less than solid framerate. It was proven with photos that E3 demos were running on PC's with Titan cards. But hey you can console yourself with the knowledge that it was actual X180 hardware and Crytek don't want you playing at such high settings! LMFAO

hahaha you must be a fanboy because your are blind. Do research, RYse, forza and KI were the only games running on x1 devkits at e3, all other games were running on pc. The game has better graphics with lower resolution now than it did at e3. Crytek made a good choice by lowerinf the resolution and polygons for better lightning and shaders.

I'm not even buying this game but your are a misinformed person.

 

User was warned for this post.

yo_john117