By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SxyxS on 27 September 2013
Edit Thread
darkknightkryta said:


No, i dont think capcom USA would go to Capcom japan and in turn capcom japan would go to SCEJ so they would change SCEA decisions. That is unthinkable. Nowadays, with Sony offcials on twitter it would be completely doable though. But, this happened in a different time.

 

So Capcom JAPAN would put Monster Hunter 4 exclusively on the 3DS because Capom USA couldn't convince Sony USA to fix ad-hoc party?  Again, SCEJ would bend over backwards for Monster Hunter if they could.  So why wouldn't Capcom Japan to go Sony Japan and say "Get SCEA to fix ad-hoc party or else you'll loose Monster Hunter" instead of just throwing it on the 3DS exclusively without thought?  On top of that Capcom has no explanation as to why it's not on the Wii U either other than "The way that we work with Monster Hunter games is that we see them as single entities, so we don’t develop for one platform and then think about porting it to another platform". 

Yet Monster Hunter 3G is perfectly acceptable as a multi because they want more people to play it?  They can't even come up with a good excuse for anything and you'll believe them when their PR man puts blame to Sony?

i like this "no ad hoc party" arguement.

As it is saying that Capcom on the one hand are crying like little babies about ad hoc but on the other hand having no problems/complaints to release an online game exclusively for that company that gives a shit about online gaming and has an almost non existing online infrastructure.(still trying to find a little logic in this)