| fatslob-:O said: Spinning off fabs was actually a good idea seeing as how amd didn't have alot of money anymore to support expensive node transitions and plus that event led them to profit for the first time in the last 3 years. :P (No I am not joking about it, that tells amd that their in seriously bad shape.) The reason why they didn't release anything in more than 12 months had to do with not having alot of performance gains too. |
Yet, if they opened their fabs to other companies to produce chips for them, the fabs would have been more heavily utilised and AMD would have made some cash on the side even the fabs on old fabrication processes, which are great for things like Audio DACS.
But it was too little to late after ATI's aquisition.
Anyway, no point discussing the "could have's" and "Should haves". :P
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
