By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem on 26 September 2013
Edit Thread
Teflon02 said:
 


Why don't you find some info on me before you try claim I think Sony is all rosey lol. Try find my last 10 comments on the PS Blog, same name I'm using as this. Go ahead, you'll see I complain almost always, also on here I've stated plenty of things that piss me off like the lack of Crash on Vita in NA, that is ridiculous. Sony does some stupid things. BUT arrogant because of something like that? No. Yet appearantly Capcom isn't arrogant? Do you know what capcom is? I love Street Fighter but 4 Street Fighter 4's with updates is as arrognt as it get's also the trolling they've done with Megaman? The creator couldn't even take Capcom, how are you trying to defend them? Also again contradiction, how is Sony not changing the function of ad-hoc Party arrogant, yet Capcom not releasing the game because they'd rather Sony change ad-hoc then create servers to play on? Capcom is hell right now. They have my fav Fighting series (basic fighter, I only like Smash and PS All-Star more) and one of my all time fav Character and games of his, Megaman. But Capcom is definitely being difficult with everyone.


I guess you are doing the same thinking i am sympathetic with capcom. Each case is a case. On the MH case we were told the reason why we didnt get MH3P in the west. The other games and the crap Capcom has been doing is a different matter.

darkknightkryta said:
 

@Nem

Do you honestly think Capcom wouldn't have gone to SEAJ and say "Monster Hunter 4 is going to 3DS only if you don't fix ad-hoc party"?  I can assure you every single programmer at SEAJ would have stopped whatever they were doing and updated Ad-hoc party.  Even if SCEA was being stubborn, SCEAJ can override anything they do.  And what are you missing about my point about Monster Hunter 3G?  When Capcom was asked about no Wii U version of Monster Hunter 4 they said Monster Hunter games need to be exclusive which is why there's only a 3DS version.  They actually said that at a 3G event.  Monster Hunter 3G: Multiplatform, Monster Hunter needs to be exclusive, see the contradiction?  It's like doing a proof of 2=1 and ignoring the divide by zero.  Resident Evil Revelations sold well on the 3DS, almost a million.  There was a handheld market for it; Capcom wanted more.  Hell, considering how bad those ports have sold, think the Vita version wouldn't atleast sell as well as the PS3 version?  PS3 to Vita and vice versa ports are very easy and require very few people and time.  The money coming in greatly offset the cost of the port.  Plain and simple, it's lost money for them not to have made a Vita version.  Which goes back to the handheld contract Capcom must have signed which most likely expired at Monster Hunter 4s release.


No, i dont think capcom USA would go to Capcom japan and in turn capcom japan would go to SCEJ so they would change SCEA decisions. That is unthinkable. Nowadays, with Sony offcials on twitter it would be completely doable though. But, this happened in a different time.