happydolphin said:
My post wasn't really about Valve, more than it was about the fact that current market trends set by traditional console makers are going to get run over by bigger competitors that know how to make the hundreds of millions of sales, such as Apple, Google and Samsung, much like how Apple ran over its competition in the phone market. If it's Valve then that's who it'll be, but in the end whether it's Valve or another player, that's what will happen in the near future next gen or the one after, if not during this gen. Mostly, my post was about how consoles that evolve throughout a gen are the future of console gaming. So PC-type architecture is the natural future for console gaming. It's a no-brainer. Why have a static console when you can have an evolving console that improves over time, with a base-line if needed? I'm not sure I see how the article relates to the cloud. But even then, Google makes the majority of its revenue off the cloud. I'm not sure it's like Phazon. But that's kind of off-topic. |
Because when you have evolving consoles you get Sega'd.Its market fragmentation and variant other intracracies that I'll address further. I understood the pont you were making about Valve, but the market isnt exactly, stationary in that manner.
Im just saying that Cloud is a fragile infrastructure in the end that does more for the company trying to sell you a service than it does for you as a consumer.
They make more money off selling services for rent after all.
