By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zekkyou said:
yo_john117 said:

If you're going to make a comparison list you have to add in all games from each console. Not adding Move or Kinect games makes no sense since they are an integral part of each platform not to mention it makes your list inaccurate.

I hate comparisons that are skewed. If you're going to do it, do it right.


Anyways from the list I can see that all three consoles have plenty of quality exclusives...but I already knew that. I can however appreciate the work that went into making the thread. If it wasn't flawed it would be an amazing comparison.

I'll be doing a separate list for Move/Kinect (i put that in the OP). The need to purchase an extra peripheral (The kinect is still almost £90 in the UK) was enough of a reason for me to exclude them. When you also consider that, other than Dance Central, there aren’t any Kinect/Move games with above a 79 rating, I didn’t feel it skewered the list much at all.

 

There was no perfect way to do these graphs, so I went with the method that showed the most “honest” results.

I was under the impression that there are actually a decent number of games above a 79 on Kinect and Move. 

My reasoning for including them is since you're strictly comparing exclusives and console exclusives based on metacritic then you should add all exclusives and consoles exclusives (top 50, and top 35 respectively) to the list.

If your comparison was to show possible adopters of a system (which, at this point in time would be a kind of pointless thing to do considering what website we're on) the metacritic of each console then your thread would be more suited for it. But because it's simply a comparison, it should have all games added to it.