By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ninjablade said:
fatslob-:O said:
cheesecake said:
fatslob-:O said:
FrancisNobleman said:
fatslob-:O said:

It's based on the fact that chipworks took a die shot and digital foundry did an analysis on it. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-wii-u-graphics-power-finally-revealed

The similarities to the AMD RV770 basically means it has 16 TMU's compared to the PS3's 24 TMU's. 

Like I said these small caches are fine if you attempt tiled rendering(software wise ofcourse).


The similarities between ps3 and a george foreman griller basically means it is not a console at all.

 

....

 

Next time make claims on facts. Only wii u devs under nda's know how many tmus it has, you surelly are not included in that category.

Surely you need to go look at digital foundry's analysis and calm your horses down down buddy, no need to flamebait me, and FYI I'm a PC gamer.


you mean the guys who came to the conclusion that they know everything about the WiiU's GPU, all the while saying that they don't know much about the WiiU's GPU?

I know the analysis is not perfect but you can't completely discount it.

the analysis was crap.

Yours isn't any better either. (Like seriously, I the wii u's gpu is small but it's not that small and ninjablade you very little about semiconductors compared to the others on this site. There is no need to downplay the wii u's spec without evidence to say that the wii does have 160 shader processors.) 

@Everyone Seriously does everyone here need to downplay digital foundry's analysis for the sake of defending the wii u or including wii u haters like ninjablade here to prove that the wii u is weaker ? Seriously I'm just one button away from reporting this whole thread.