Perfect site reputation so far!

[Lafiel]

MDMAlliance said:

Lafiel said:

That is wrong. I don't need to be condescending to have character and be interesting.

And in an argument I trust actual arguments over adhominems, prejudices and insults.

Funny enough, here are the two posts that got me warned
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5165670
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5565816

The first post I personally don't think should have got me warned.
The second post wasn't me insulting him, but insulting his interpretation.  

Though I can see why I got warned on the second post.

Well, the first one is an ad hominem - I don't know what happend in that thread before, but while Deyons post wasn't very "nice", butting into the conversation to basically say "he is a troll" certainly was unneccessary, although I can't claim never to have done similar things. I guess I got away with it with "better" wording, but in hindsight those posts weren't up to my own standards.

The second one looks very clear to me, as I can only really read that as an insult directed at the person and not at the argument.