Valve Steambox could outpower XB1 and PS4, according to CGM

[fatslob-:O]

Pemalite said:

fatslob-:O said:

Pemalite said:

That link just reinforces my argument.

I don't know about you but accuracy is important for emulation and plus your point is that we don't need to emulate x86 processors was pretty rash statement from yourself.

Not always.
SNES 9x isn't very accurate, it is however "Good enough" for the majority of people, if you were to emulate that console with 100% accuracy and at full speed, you would need a stupidly fast system.
BSNES being a good example of a more accurate emulator.
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2011/08/accuracy-takes-power-one-mans-3ghz-quest-to-build-a-perfect-snes-emulator/

Also, my comment wasn't rash, it was logical and I gave reasonings why and people have done it.
Heck, Cxbx isn't even an emulator, it's a converter, well it started out that way anyway.

And I quote: "the code that tends to eat up the CPU) can be executed directly."
http://www.caustik.com/cxbx/progress.htm

What I heard from PCSX2 developers is that you need a fix to get around the issues of accuracy.

And look at the quote before. "a large precentage" That means that there are still some issues to using a direct code to execute on the cpu.