curl-6 said:
fatslob-:O said:
curl-6 said:
Digital Foundry's article is based on incomplete evidence. It's speculation presented as hard proof.
There's still lots about the chip that only devs and Nintendo themselves know.
|
Anandtech also does a little benchmarking and finds out that the WII U's processor doesn't obliterate the tablet processors. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6465/nintendo-wii-u-teardown
And by obliterate I mean being able to get like 2 to 3 times more performance than the motorola droid.
You realize that digital foundry's article has some evidence.
|
That benchmark is a test of browser speed, not processor speed.
And yes, Digital Foundry has some evidence, but they don't have the whole picture, which they admit in the article.
|
I'm pretty sure it test the processor speed and not the internet speed and that benchmark was used for processing miscellaneous things on a cpu and what's more is that by looking at the tables it's slower than every phone processors. I just noticed lower is better.
Edit: Now I know why 4A games made the claim why the ibm espresso was slow.
