| endimion said: whoa so many insecure PS fans.... I'm starting to wonder if they did realize raw specs on paper means pretty much nothing, especially since nobody is tapping anywhere close to the max capacity of any console before several years into the gen, that raw power has never been the main selling point and that so far I have yet to see any games announced on PS4 that got me jumping up and down because it seemed new or refreshing (and I'm not talking about arcade/indi games, those needs will be largely satisfied on both consoles and don't usually need crazy horsepower) well that might explain why they spend more time on MS forums than on Sony.... not much to talk about beside superior hardware apparently.... and a lot of time to waste to diss MS potential superiority on every other front..... |
And by your signature, posts and images I don't think you would really support PS4 even if it costed just US$ 100,00 and had more than 100 AAA shipping on launch.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







