bdbdbd said:
Actually they didn't kidnap british soldiers. They got arrested for entering Iran without permission. Iran is not Iraq, as stated earlier. Differences are that Iran is bigger, it has more motivated army, everybody knew what weaponery Iraq had. Nobody really knows what Iran has, but it's definately more heavy than what Iraq had. You're right about that one, that if US would attack, it would do it by air, but after that war, i wouldn't expect gulf of Persia having US troops anymore. USA wouldn't be getting international support, and Israel isn't necessarily in a situation it could really start attacking, since Iran isn't the only neigbouring country that wants the jews out of middle-east. After all, the thing why Iran is in the axis of evil, is because they wanted to trade oil in Euros. Like Iraq. |
The british soldiers never entered Iran, they were in international waters when they were attacked by the Iranian army or whatever its called. Iraq also had a very motivated army during the first gulf war, but when you are in your tank and all of a sudden the tanks beside you start to blow up and you have no idea what did it, you start to lose your will to fight.
Also the attack on baghdad during the first gulf war was a great example of the military power that the US would bring down on Iran, this city had more SAM sites and AA guns then any location in the entire Veitnam war and the US was able to have bombers overhead and they were not being fired on until buildings started to blow up, then the Iraqi's started to fire blindly into the air. The US airforce is 100x stronger then what they were 17years ago. US bombers could go undected across Iran and drop 80 GPS guilded missiles each.







