By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Scoobes said:
Zappykins said:
Imaginedvl said:

They know what you are talking about :) But just because you said "CPU" instead of "chip" they are just sticking on it so they can ignore everything else and just bash you with this...

I do say Co-Processors in the same sentence, and I've been really clear about what I'm referring too.  But it's the chip that contains the CPUs, der, they know they, just trying to get me into trouble. 

I wish they just had some confidence in their system of choice, and could stay on threads that make them happy but then, perhaps they are hearing the same things I am, so they have good reasons to be worried.

Microsoft took a big risk adding all those co-processors.  Some of which we don't even know what they do yet.  It will be fantastic if they can pull it off, and still make it easy to program, through their DirectX system.  So far, looks like they will be able to do just that.

Yes, you use co-processors in the same sentence but its worded in such a way that it basically says the CPU is larger in the X1, as are the co-processors. The CPU part is technically wrong, the co-processor part is unknown (on PS4). If you're talking about the entire chip then say so (APU or SoC), otherwise it sounds like you're just spreading misinformation.

These are tech discussions so it helps if people are as accurate as possible. Otherwise you just come off as ignorant.

Your expectations are just too high: "secret sauce" PR bullcr..., er, stuff, and "technical accuracy" shouldn't belong to the same thread.   

PS And all this talking about chips with secret sauces just made me have an unnecessary night snack, as if I didn't eat enough.   



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW!