Machiavellian said:
I jumped into the part where you stated developers know about something they have no experience using. That has always been my argument. I care not for the willy waving on which console has the most power. You made a point i felt was not valid and I gave you examples whether you liked them or not to that effect. You do not have to care about how well a dev can code but it makes no sense to trust in someone ability if they cannot perform their job well. If I was going to see a doctor and I knew what his grades are in college, why would I go to the C student instead of the A student. Why would you value the C student word over the A student. This would be no different with a developer. If one developer says something is to complex or i cannot wrap my head around it, but a more accomplished developer says opposite, then I would side with the more accomplish developer @Bolded: How?? How can someone actually tell you about performance of a device without actually coding to it. I have absolutly no clue how this can be done reliably. You mention better hardware how do you know all parts of the hardware is better. The only true better spec is the GPU. Even with the memory, who can tell how each one can be used for better performance. Is it easier on the PS4 end, yes, but easier doesn't make it better and each comes with pros and cons no layman knows how they effect the total system without actually using the tools provided by both companies to extract performance from those systems. @ 2nd Bolded. There is no theory, this is my opinion on how I trust anon sources. Without being able to verify who these sources are they will always be suspect. I care not why a source feel the need to release info they are signed into agreement not to share. I only care about the information is the truth and without verification of the source or the information, I have no reason to believe it on blind faith until proven different. |
I guess you don't get it. You made an argument when there was none. You are sitting here trying to tell me that this jurno's anonymous source is some crap dev who doesn't know how to code? Your argument as well as your logic are crap. Moot. Null. Void. You threw yourself into anrgument you had nothing to do with so you could argue with me about something I never said. A crap dev will know just as much about a platforms performance as a great dev. The problem comes in at coding, not knowledge of hardware. But since you're a dev, you would know that.
I can see now that you are comepletely clueless, and I highly doubt you are a dev. Maybe a website dev, but I think you are lying. You are clueless if you think you have to code for a machine to know its theoretical performance. Like I said in an earlier post....There are harware engineers. There are people who do reasearch and know PC hardware and architecture as well as the pros.
Again you show your true colors. The real reason you are arguing with me is bolded. Don't try to say that's not the reason again please. You are absolutely wrong on that point also. PS4 is better in every way possible. Better GPU, better RAM, better system architecture, less OS overhead, better dev tools. You can deny this all you want, but it is true and I am right. Any one that has an inkling about PC tech knows that PS4 memory architecture is not only more simple than the Ones, it has better performance to boot. Any dev that has an inkling about what they are doing will tell you no amount of coding can close the gap because the architecture is so similar, with the PS4's being better.
Your opinion is a theory, and a pretty crappy one at that. Opinions can be theories. Your theory is that anonymous sources are not to be trusted unless they are outed. That is a theory and an opinion. History has proved them wrong. Watergate.....an anonymous source called depthroat. We learn that the NSA was spying on us through an anonymous source until the gov't outed him. Plenty of reliable info comes from anon sources. Just because they are saying something you don't like doesn't mean all anon sources are all of a sudden untustworthy joe schmoes who don't really know anything. You are lumping every dev that has put their two cents in on this discussion as crappy devs because they want to remain anonymous. Does that really make sense to you? Does that really sound logical?
