By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
darconi said:
konnichiwa said:
 

I have a better idea to let you shut up with your nonsense.

This are the magazines/sites that reviewed MK64 and CTR.

First % => MK64
Second % => CTR

GamePro 100.00%/100%
Electronic Gaming Monthly 92.5%/93%
Electric Playground 90.0%/95%
Gaming Age 88.0%/90%
IGN 81.0%/85%
Game Revolution 75.0%/90%
GameSpot 64.0%/84%
Next Generation 60.0%/100%


Happy now? So you can see CTR never had a score under MK64 at any of those sites/mags.


If you are going to weep now please go to an other forum we don't need persons like you.

Bye.


 Wow, you are a very little person if you think this was the point.  Do I care if MK64 or CTR is better?  Hell no, the whole point was comparing ratings of two games with two different number of reviews was not an accurate measure.  

So either grow up and learn something about debate and statistics or don't bother making stupid statements. 


 If you don't care about it you would not have made a big deal about the fact that MK64 had less reviews than CTR...


Especially for you I searched witch sites made a review about MK64 and CTR.

That's fair right?

Well if you think GameSpot is biased against Nintendo then you can scrap that one but are you going
to say now that EGM, EP, GA, IGN, GR,NG are all also biased against Nintendo?


Well I made a research the only thing you did was complaining that it isn't fair that MK64 had less reviews...

*gives handkerchief*  

Bye.