Soundwave said:
I still think there would be far less belly aching about the Wii U if Nintendo simply launched with a "big" game. People want that big Mario 64/Metroid Prime/Zelda: TP type experience before they consider a Nintendo console to be launched properly. That's kinda the problem. |
Yes but 360 had 48 games in Jan-Sept of 2006 and PS3 had 44 in the same time period in 2007 so they each had about 2.5x as many games as Wii U this year so either way u try to split it, the "no games" argument is valid especially when u consider half of them are late ports.
I agree that a "big game" would help or at least just not letting all the games get delayed. Wii U had a good launch and sold 2.25m in 2012 but had nothing to back it up. Lets say Pikmin 3, Wonderful 101, Rayman Legends, Game & Wario, Wii Fit U all came out in Jan-Apr like planned and Aliens/Metro werent cancelled, that would have essentially doubled the Wii U releases and would have been able to help sustain that momentum post launch. A summer drought would have still occured but a 2-3 month drought is much better than a 7 month drought and too much time has gone by for those titles to instantly revive Wii U, its gonna take some time to rebuilt momentum.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.