By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
iamdeath on 16 September 2013
Edit Thread
sundin13 said:

Why should the game not be compared to console FPS games? Does the smaller screen limit originality, creativity and level design? This isn't the age of the GBA anymore, Vita games can look damn good (as proven by this game) and there is really nothing holding it back. What I read in reviews was that while this is a good game, its not special or remarkable, its just going through the motions and as such, a 77% is right about where it should be on the current review scale.

Also, user reviews mean nothing. You proved it yourself when you said that that atrocious CoD Vita game got a 4/5 from users.

 

EDIT: @MikeRox: did you read RE: Revelations reviews? the most common complaints were the controls (single analog) and the fact that the campaign was fragmented (to make it more accessible for handhelds). So yeah, it did get marked down for being on a handheld and for good reason.


I think graphics are the only area in which review scores should be scaled to the console btw


Anopther one who states assumptions as fact yet has never played the game........................ The game is a lot betetr the "Going throgh the motions". Did you read the thread, it is as good as console fps, the only difference is the graphical and scope differences because its ona  handheld. Mercenary is better then KZ3 imo.

 

77 is not right at all for a genre pushing game for its platform...another example of handhelds and especially vita not getting the credit it deserves.