ProdigyBam said:
See, Your logic is flawed. |
I'm not saying it's a ''valid'' way to look at things, but some ppl do look at it that way tho. Just trying to give a hypothesis on why the scores are low, not why the game deserve low scores.
A other explanation that came to my mind, and it's my main problem with the vita. For me, to really want a handheld game, it has to give me something unique to handheld games and that I can't get anywhere else on consoles. I have'nt played Killzone so I can't say for certain that this is the case, but it seems to me that it only gives you a console experience but on the vita. It may be a really good game, but you can get similar if not better on PS3. So when I see a 75/100 score I think ''This game is really good and worth playing, but if you can you might aswell pick up Killzone3 on PS3 instead. If you can't, that game is still a more than valuable option and you will be happy with it''
I love my 3DS games, but most of them if they were on my home console I would'nt be interested as much, same thing goes for games like bioshock or Arkham City, if they were on handheld I would'nt be as interested.
What?! I can't hear you over all this awsome! - Pyrrhon (Kid Icarus:Uprising)
Final Ultimate Legendary Earth Power Super Max Justice Future Miracle Dream Beautiful Galaxy Big Bang Little Bang Sunrise Starlight Infinite Fabulous Totally Final Wonderful Arrow...FIRE! - Wonder-Red (The Wonderful101)