By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik said:
g911turbo said:
You actually have a good point on the kinect centric games... where are they?  Why do I need kinect other than to say xbox on, skype, fantasy football, etc.  At the end of the day, it appears microsoft is trying to make the consumer eat the cost of it.  Might be a smart decision at the end of the day.

Sell out a launch bundle at 500, calling it a "launch edition" then sell a 400 sku later on once the initial rush has died down.  Why let ebayers make all the money? Could be bad PR though if they drop the price too quickly after launch.

The games are where 2.0 version of Kinect is supposed to show up.  There is some mix with regular TV, but $500 for an enhancement to regular TV, plus a Gold membership?  With tax that is like $600 or more.  So, I will say the games matter.  And I am not seeing early adopters excited about it.  This thread is the extent of the reasoning on it:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=168512&page=1

I do wish there was more.

Right now I am finding it hard to justify the 100 premium over PS4.  Of course, I will eventually own all the systems Xbox and Wii U as well.  But they need to provide me something more to "jump in" so early.