Zero999 said:
they are the most recent numbers. saying sony is the biggest because of ps and ps2 is the same as saying nintendo is the biggest because of nes and snes. in the past gen, ds beat psp and wii beat ps3. now 3ds is beating vita and we are yet to see wii u vs ps4. |
So do it even more interesting... just "current gen"
wiiU+3DS = 34M psvita+ps4= 5M...
And what I done was much more "actual" data, I put the sales of the week and even though ps have 3 plats on it an ninty have 4, sony still won... admit you want to use the most favorable data you can, one where ninty would be selling more in each direct confront so you fell better. Saying that putting PS2 isn't a nice way to look because it isn't current is the same using data for Wii vs PS3 from 2008 and not 2013.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







