Vetteman94 said:
There is no point because he never makes that assumption that he does know the PS4 architecture. And if people want to argue what games look better or what system will be more powerful before the technical specifications are released is one thing. But to use the specifications that have been released to come to your own conclusions without the proper knowledge on the subject is just plain ignorance. And its being done in this and many other threads. And you can try and start a friendly debate all you want, but there is no debate to be had. #1:You can't debate facts, technical specification and their outputs are facts. There is no debating that, you can only debate opinions. And there is no opinion to be had with technical specifications. And spreading misinformation does more to harm your potential buyers than what you claim they are doing. #2:Do you really think people outside of video game forums hear about this? No, and the majority of the people he is calling idiots and telling them to STFU, aren't going to buy their system anyway, and the ones who will buy their system agree that people shouldn't talk about shit they don't understand. #3:What Penello has said can not be used to scrutinize what this guy said, if you want to scrutinize what he Penello said then go find that thread and bitch to your hearts content. But this guy has said nothing wrong, and in fact I appluad him to stand up and tell people to shut up about shit they don't understand. And no you arent the only one confused here, everyone else that had a similar agenda to you is included in that as well. BTW, saying that you never brought up technical specs, except from the one time that I did bring up technical specs, isn't a very good denial. If it happened one time, you can't say you never did it. |
#1 - What a silly statement. Each of these systems have specs that are debated all the time. So because the PS4 has more Shaders and ROPs and a dedicated GPU bus interface does that make it better or more powerful? Or, because the XB1 has lower latency DDR3 which helps with better or faster raytracing and procedural generation make it better or more powerful? Both of those specs are factual statements yet they are indeed debatable when we ar discussing which system is more powerful. Not to mention all the debates going over the actual archtiecture tweaks done by both SOny and MS and the claims of having extra 'secret sauce' etc. etc.
#2 - Then what is the point of him even bothering to say anything? Again kind of a silly argument don't you think?
#3 - Sigh... I never said there was anything "wrong" with him saying anything I said it is pointless to do and does nothing to help him or MS or the XB1 console's reception by the gaming community. You applaud him great, I don't I think he is attempting to head off talk about the consoles differences out of an inherent lack of confidence in the system he develops for. Yeah there is confusion abound mostly due to the lack of transparency of BOTH MS and SOny regarding the specifics regarding the hardware involved but that does not mean people can't discuss them. Also, I don't have to deny anything as my postings in this thread speak for themselves. My agenda is/was to talk about exactly what I posted but you are free to infer what you wish. Lastly, you sir seem to be doing the 'bitching' and I understand if you are not into debating on a friendly basis. I will then make this my last attempt at addressing your response to my initial posting. You are more than free to respond in kind though :)