greenmedic88 on 10 September 2013
Lost it right here:
"• We have more memory bandwidth. 176gb/sec is peak on paper for GDDR5. Our peak on paper is 272gb/sec. (68gb/sec DDR3 + 204gb/sec on ESRAM). ESRAM can do read/write cycles simultaneously so I see this number mis-quoted."
Doesn't work that way. Even if every bit of data ran directly through the ESRAM, which it can't, due to the relatively tiny allotment, the speed of the ESRAM wouldn't be "boosted" an additional 68gb/sec by the much slower DDR3 memory.
