CGI-Quality said:
walsufnir said:
CGI-Quality said:
walsufnir said:
I don't like cross-genre comparisons in graphics but yes, it is the best looking next-gen shooter. And the only one I know of in 30fps. Again, nothing wrong with it, but it woudln't look like that in 60fps. Also I think the new COD will prove to look in a way that it isn't possible on current-gen so it is automatically next-gen. Perhaps we are also confusing tech with art-style now. I say KZ looks really amazing but it does for a (technical) reason. This isn't downplaying the graphics but a reason for them.
|
You are downplaying, but sure, go with it. If we just forget that one mode, the most robust one at that, runs @ 60FPS/1080p, and is exclusive to one device, then sure, you'd have a point. It makes sense why it's the best looking shooter, and I'd bet not the most of which is due to a halved framerate of one mode.
|
Sorry but this is fanboyish talk. I didn't expect it from you, consider me disappointed on this statement. But we won't agree on this point. I hope the gameplay won't suffer from the 30fps, I am really looking forward to play it.
|
Call it what you want (and nevermind that your opinion of me is very irrelevant - and funny, since that kind of talk usually comes from disgruntled Xbox fans ;)), but you're doing what I'm doing, speculating. I'm also not expecting the gameplay to suffer, especially not while its main selling point runs @ 60FPS. Needeless to say, my original post displaying 100% opinion didn't require a pointless tech explanation.
Anyway, agreeing to disagree is good, let it die here. As the title suggest, this wasn't meant to be a competitive topic, anyway.
|
Not sure what the negativety is all about.... He was hoping single player was 60 fps like multiplayer, what's wrong with that? He's looking forward to playing it, how does that make him sound like a disgruntled xbox fan?
