By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheHunt3r_Orion on 08 September 2013
Edit Thread
JoeTheBro said:
TheHunt3r_Orion said:
JoeTheBro said:

@BOLD

AMD

Sony

Microsoft

1st link says nothing. AMD was talking about HUMA on the PS4, which the Xbox One has and has been confirmed by Tom's Hardware here. http://www.tomshardware.com/news/xbox-one-processor-jaguar-apu-huma,24035.html

2nd link is discredited by your first link because nowhere in that article does it say anything about power. Did you post that link thinking I wouldn't read???

3rd link WHO is the developer? If Microsoft where hiding something, could Microsoft be sure that developer would not talk if he knew? And it is no longer an if that Microsoft is hiding something. Albert Penello and Major Nelson have confirmed it.

So. Denied, denied, denied. Three times. Try again if you want.

I can't help you. Only solution to your dillusion is time.

And please for the love of God actually read the whole interview before saying what I underlined.

GC: Okay, well this issue is specific to the PS4 and it’s that although no one seems to argue that it’s more powerful than the Xbox One I worry that that power is not going to be used in multiformat games. Because it wasn’t with the PS3. I can understand there not being a big difference at launch but are you confident that’s not going to be the norm going forward?

JR: I think you’re correct in pointing out that multiformat games often develop to the lowest common denominator. And that phenomenon has certainly been apparent on the PS3/Xbox 360 gen. I think these big games now are becoming so big that there is a chance… I guess it all comes down to economics at the end of the day. Because multiformat publishers, they’re rational – well in most cases they’re rational…

GC: [laughs]

JR: They’re rational businessmen whose obligation is to behave in the best interest of their shareholders. So to the extent that we can demonstrate that going the extra yard on the PS4 SKU is gonna result in some tangible financial benefit to them they will. If we can’t demonstrate that they won’t.

Before you criticize my "dillusion", I asked you to provide in order because that order is very specific. I discredited your first your link, which you ignored. Your second link, I'll give you that Sony is confirming what everyone else believes. AMD has not confirmed it, so it's kind of Sony's word against Microsoft's word now. Doesn't matter what you actually think. And the third link? You completely ignored also.

So. On to you and your actual dillusion. There is something you cannot comprehend that is so simple. Really basic. MICROSOFT has said that the power difference is not as big as it seems and that you do not know everything they have in their console. In the Xbox One. What do you not understand about that?

Now. You want cold hard proof of a dGPU in the Xbox One?

"GPU Design Verification Engineer
AMD
Febuary 2011-Present (2 years 7 months)
Graphics Core IP Design Verification, APU/DGPU
Xbox One, Playstation 4"

AMD has all but said it. But if you gotta wait, you gotta wait. Moral of the story? How about you all approach me with cold hard evidence like I have given you since some of you happen to know what Microsoft has told you that you don't know. Do me that respect besides just saying I am wrong because that's what you believe, no matter the evidence.