By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
platformmaster918 said:
J_Allard said:
riderz13371 said:

Yes but with PS Plus you get a large variety of rentals on a large variety of consoles. 5$ a month for PSP, PS Vita and PS3 games (soon to include PS4 also). Plus it just so happens that PS Plus actually offers very good games (They have a metacritic standard of 70+ I believe). I would hardly call either service giving you "real" ownership of games, seeing as it's all digital. But yes, I guess if you don't care for the types of games you get, as long as you get to keep them, then Xbox gold is for you. Do you know for how long they will be doing this? I thought I remember hearing them say up until the release of Xbox One or something.

What I said about having choice applies to both. But the only part of that post that matters is rental. People should stop comparing rentals to real free games you own. And there is no 70+ Metacritic requirement.

I'm sorry but is this honestly a problem for anyone?  I mean who is getting all these games and saying "I think I'll stop subscribing"?  Seriously, who the eff is this guy?  95% customer satisfaction.  I haven't heard one bad thing about Plus since it started from people who actually use it except maybe that European gamers get better games than NA ones (which is true).  When I tell non fanboy Xbox friends from my real life they all gauk at how many games I'm getting and ask "So you get to keep them?" and I say "Yeah as long as you stay subscribed."  They then moan about how they're paying more just to play online.  Sorry but I haven't met anyone who regards this as a problem or talked to any Plus subscribers who view it as one.

Who said it's a problem? It seems per usual, you are lost on the context because you're too quick to defend.