SSJGohan3972 said:
I watch the NFL pretty regularly but I don't do the fantasy stuff or watch multiple games at the same time and it's not that big a deal for me if I miss a week etc., but there are a LOT of very big NFL fans that pay hundreds of extra dollars on their already heavy cable or satellite bills to be able to watch every game just so they can study the games for their fantasy leagues, etc. Some of those same people might find the motion and voice controls cool and these people also include a large group of people that have large amounts of dispossable income (or credit) that overpay for TVs, audio/video systems, etc. and there's a chance if they like these features Microsoft might be able to intice them into dropping $500 just for these features - and heck just putting the advertisement out has got people like us talking about the XB1 again and that just translates to more knowledge of the subject matter for more people (the main point of advertising I believe). I don't understand why people can't understand this but not everything is necessarily directed at you. |
too many quotes. as they all basically say the same thing so i'm just going to choose you to respond too...
..this is nothing to do with me. the debate is centered around "what is the audience?". ESPN was announced for 360 at E3 2010 and many made the exact same claims about how this is big back then. it released to no fanfare in the sportz community and did nothing to expand 360's market. fast forward to today and i'm rebutteling against those that think this is going to be impactful. it has no exclusive content. it is expensive. it many ways is it a hindrance to how a majority of people enjoy watching the game. the target audience is tiny for this and limited to sportz fanatics that also already want a gaming machine. someone is going to love the shit out of this and many prexisting xbox fans will enjoy having it too. ..but the impact to expanding the xbox brand will be miniscule.








