By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
riderz13371 said:

What is the link between what you said and the graphical aspect of a game, because you understood that I was talking about the "graphical" aspect of the game, right? You did not try to jump on your keyboard to defend your precious game without really understanding my point, right? This is actually "kind of the topic" of the thread, right? Yah funny :)

And it is matter of oppinion at the end; even if you did not closely responded to my point and blindly defended Killzone just because someone does not think it is the best thing the earth has seen in the past month, my oppinion (and I'm not the only one if you look at this thread) is that graphicaly , Killzone is not really different than Titanfall, Ryse, Crysis 3 (PC), etc... And yes, Sci-Fi game, way easier to get awesome visuals than modern military shooters...

Imaginedvl said:
riderz13371 said:
Imaginedvl said:
iceland said:
COD:Ghosts>Killzone

Well, honestly; I can understand why Sony enthousiasts are hyped like crazy about Killzone but (and I already gave my oppinion on that) it is nothing better than Crysis 3; Forza 5, Titanfall, Ryse etc...

Now I do not know if COD: Ghost is really better than Killzone graphicaly. While Killzone is playing the super safe way (Sci-Fiction) which is always very easy to look impressive; it is still very nice (even if he looks as boring as the other ones, personnal oppinion here no need to post a 10 pages argumentations). COD: Ghost on the other hand focusing on the gameplay; which will be as fantastic as the other ones but maybe less on the graphical side.

Killzone is playing the safe way? Funny, I thought the market was saturated with military shooters. I guess now the tides have turned.

Alright then I guess according to you Halo is playing it super safe because it's a "sci fi" game. I can't wait for the day where you defend the next Halo games graphics. I will make sure to keep this post of yours saved on my computer so I can bring it up to you and say the graphics look good because they are playing it "the super safe way".

lol, just get a break now...

I never said Killzone was bad lol You are just making this out of your ass because you do not like that your game/console/whatever is not being pointed out as the best thing in the universe... Graphicaly is it easier to produce Sci-Fi stuff than modern or even medieval... It does not mean the graphics of a game sucks. And Halo 5 will certainly be awesome on the graphic side, still it is easier to get it done than creating a game with the same graphical level for a modern/medivial game...  Comparing Killzone to Crysis 3, Forza 5, Ryze, Titanfall is not "attacking" it, so why are you talking about "defending" your game, you are the one who seem to believe that it needs to be defended.

Now, have fun saving this on your computer all you want :)