By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goatseye on 05 September 2013
Edit Thread
kitler53 said:
TheSting said:


2nd question-you know that there are other easier ways to watch a game? Why go to a game if you could just watch from somewhere else?

3rd-The guy who doesn't think it's desperate or that it's an interruption. Just cause you say it doesn't make it true. 

 

 

4th-maybe it won't be intrusive to most people at all. PiP works great. Side by Side(ESPN) also works great. 

 1. you understand that you can't watch NFL on xbone without already having a cable service with a subscription to ESPN right?  this changes nothing about what content you have access to.  it's not a matter of going to the game or getting an xbox.  it's a matter of paying $500 + $60 a year in xbl to watch the same games that the ESPN subscriber already has access to just without the fantasy football stats on the side.  is that really a compelling offer to you?

2. ..and just because you say it doesn't make it true.  but i know i don't answer any calls during a game.  whatever it is it can wait.

3. have you not seen the screens?  it is damn intrusive imo...    i'd rather have half my screen back especially as a majority of the score updates are already part of the brocast.

 

1- In case of ESPN you just need internet subscription not cable. And I pay $32 a year for XBL.

2- I call my cousin during the games to tell him in your face when my team scores. With Skype? It's really gonna be in his face.

3- I'm used to watch European soccer leagues on week-end with a shrunk screen by news tickers cause I'm a sport junkie.

Perfect device for a gamer/sports fan like me.