By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kane1389 on 05 September 2013
Edit Thread
dsgrue3 said:
Kane1389 said:
dsgrue3 said:

Dawkins and Hitchens both have many debates about Islam with Muslims. While it's true that most of their time was spent on Christianity, that is a result of it being the dominant religion in the US (Hitchens) and England (Dawkins). Sam Harris too...maybe you should familiarize yourself with these people before spewing vitriolic nonsense...then again it's all you seem to bring to the table, hence the attachment to bible thumping arguments as opposed to rational ones.

I'm actually astonished BMaker has entertained you for as long as he has. The Bible is not an authority on anything. 

Proof for Santa Claus as per Christian logic.


Does that book have real historic refrences, figures and fulfiled prophecies written hunderdes of years before their fulfilment? (and i was talking about New Testament, the Bible, so you can throw your ''LoLz Noah's ark & Genesis'' nonsense right out of the window)

Honestly, you seem like the type of person that has fake arguments in his own head and loses against his own conscience. Do you gather all your arguments from r/atheism and TheAmazingAtheist?

You can't possibly be serious.

The bible is clusterfuck of documents. Simply because one subsection of one of the entries of the collection has some historical value does not provide ANY credence for the assembly as a whole. 

If you believe in prophecies, there really isn't anything more to say to such an individual. Say hi to the tooth fairy for me.

What does this even mean? "r/atheism"? TheAmazingAtheist has no credentials so why would I take anything from him? I use science and logic to support my position. If I am using someone else's argument, I will either cite them by name or provide a source to their works. That's how educated debate works...is this foreign to you?


Hahahaha, you really are something xD

You comapred The Bible to a Santa Claus book. I asked you if that book has numerous historical refrences and figures, as well as correct predictions dating 200 years + back. You did not answer. Therefore, I hope you realize just how insanely dumb your comparison was.

And for the record, I dont consider the Bible to be ''the true holy word''. But it definitely has more hisorical, theological and scientific value than you and your reddit pals give it credit for