Osc89 said:
theprof00 said:
Osc89 said:
theprof00 said:
Exactly. There was no reason to remove it from digital purchases.
EDIT: It is more likely that family share didn't exist in the form MS tried to make it seem, so to curtail negative reception hey removed it.
Now here they are promising it again like it exists, but still don't clarify what family sharing is. What's the phrase....dangling the carrot?
|
That's true, there were rumours of a 1 hour limit on shared games. I suppose now it benefits them to make it look like they had an ok plan they announced poorly, rather than a just a completely terrible plan.
|
haha actually theyre saying they announced it fine, but it was gamers not thinking clearly about it that was the problem. Now that we've had time to think about it, we are more receptive to it. That's what MS are saying here.
|
I don't think anyone would agree with that. A TV focused reveal followed by journalists having to pull out all that (sometimes contradictory) DRM information? They must have realised what a mess they made of it. Their best play is to blame the announcement not the plan, but blaming the gamers is a stupid move.
|
Hey they've done it before :D
