By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SxyxS on 05 September 2013
Edit Thread
BlowoverKing said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
BlowoverKing said:
Pretty good score when you consider most sites are reviewing the game as a PS3 game. I mean seriously why can't people realize that the Vita is a handheld and not a home console and review it's games accordingly.

Because the system and this game are promoted as console-quality on a handheld? It is a lot cheaper than the console versions though, so they should take that into account. 


But the fact remains that it's a handheld game regaurdless of what Sony's marketing team says. The Vita is a Vita, not a PS3 and comparing it's games to PS3 games is just wrong.

A 3ds game will get 90% ratings as soon as it reaches 80% console quality.Amazing a miracle-wizards created this game.Even the missing right stick will be ignored as something negative.

A vita game reaching 95% console quality will get 75% ratings,because the losers still didn't managed to reach 100% console quality.

 

Deal with it.

It's the same what we gave seen in terms of graphics.Games on Wii,no matter how ugly were never criticized because of lousy graphics.Noone cares wether there is AA ,frameratedrops or not.Games on ps360 can run smooth ,look good with antialiasing,they will be criticized for not having 2x AA,for not running with 60fps,,for not having super high res textures.

Somehow Nintendo managed it to be judged in a different way than others.