bananaking21 said:
landguy1 said:
bananaking21 said:
landguy1 said:
Sounds funny that we are to take anything away from this information. M$ decided not to do a game and Sony did. No lesson or things to read into. I am sure that the same can be said for dozens of games or business decisions. I think the OP is looking a little to hard at it to get anything other than an interesting bit on how one game went through the development cycle. |
i think the posters here are taking things to much too heart. when another user on here who is an xbox fan makes over 150 threads a month about anything pro-xbox its considered okay when he just literally spams the forums. but when i make a thread about when of my favorite games i am "trying to hard". note how i did post my personal opinion in a post not in the OP so i wouldnt try to make things an xbox-PS fanboy war. geez, you people need to chill
|
Trolling your own thread to make your point is still the same thing. You have admitted you tried to hide it outside the article to avoid the idea that you posted the article just to later make an argument. It doesn't really matter, as I don't mind people's agendas, just as long a i get the info. I think that i can come to my own conclusions regardless of the Original posters intent.
|
i stated a fact, which if you dont like it or not is your problem.
@bolded: is that you calling me a troll?
|
Yes, you trolled your own posting. Me making note of it is just part of what happens when you do it.
As far as stating a fact, that is your opinion and that is great. Again, thats the benefit of the forum. You read an article and have your opinion as to what you think it meant and i have mine. I was very clear that i thought that you restating the obvious was to make an unneeded argument(which played out throughout the thread). It isn't a problem for me, as it is obviously a problem for you that i have a differnet view of what the article represents.
