Take a look of these examples :
Disney Infinity: (PS3: 81,7 % WiiU: 77 % Xbox360: 72,6 %)
http://www.gamerankings.com/wii-u/695535-disney-infinity/index.html
Just Dance 4 ( Xbox360: 75,4 % WiiU: 68 % PS3: 77 %)
http://www.gamerankings.com/wii-u/673017-just-dance-4/index.html
Duck Tales Remastered (PS3: 71 % Xbox360: 77 %)
http://www.gamerankings.com/ps3/708530-ducktales-remastered/index.html
Sonic All-Stars Racing Transformed (Xbox360: 83 % WiiU: 77 %)
http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/669063-sonic-and-all-stars-racing-transformed/index.html
Those are only a few examples, there´s a lot more around those aggregate scores websites.
We all know and discussed how reviews are basically personal views / individual opinions etc. but it´s kind of strange to see such discrepancy between reviews / scores of pratically identical games in different platforms
I just think that reviews should at least TRY to be the least personal and more technical when reviewing a game, simply because personal opinions are too subjective and people have different tastes. So a reviewer should never say a game is bad just because he doesn´t like its cathegory (rhythm, action, puzzle, sports etc) or its art style, but because its design have flaws (gameplay, graphics and sound, controls, etc).
Unfortunately the vast majority of reviewers always put their personal feelings before a technical analysis of the, let´s call it, product, and the result are unprofessional and highly biased reviews. That´s why I think we should never trust reviews.
