Bethesda/Gearbox point out why they don't support Wii U

[Hynad]

sethnintendo said:

pokoko said:

oniyide said:

they arent saying anything that other devs and publishers have said for years. Hell anyone with a shred of common sense knows this, but yet you'll still get people who will ignore what they said and call them evil anyway. Hell its already started. This isnt about if this dev sucks or that dev sucks. Doesnt make what they are saying any less wrong

Yeah, you see the standard ad hominem attacks pile up pretty fast.  It's a LOT easier to say "Gearbox sucks" or "Bethesda sucks" than it is to speak to their argument.  We've seen the same thing recently with small developers who spoke up about Microsoft's indie policies, and before that with anyone who said the Cell processor was hard to work with.  Responses like that are usually meaningless and worthless.

Very good Bonus Round, I thought.  The DLC portion was also interesting.

 

-Nintendo made their box without really consulting 3rd parties, whereas Sony and MS have done so from a very early point of the PS4/One development.

This point is bs because why would Nintendo give a shit what Gearbox or Bethesda think about their system specs if they barely or never supported their systems in the past.

 

I know right? Why would Nintendo give a shit about any third parties? After all, most of them barely or never supported their systems in the past. ¬_¬