Shinobi-san said:
Nah, im not into the whole copy/paste articles from other sites...add one or two opinions and then call it a thread thing. I'll leave that up to the other guys. I'm more into posting, thats how I contribute to the site. Oh wait you said interesting threads? Interesting. You are clearly in the wrong. IGN said that the camera was atrocious and that elements of the MP was pretty bad. IT DID NOT DESCRIBE THE GAME AS ATROCIOUS. Which is what your intial thread title and OP implied. I also do not see how you come to the conclusion that the game is a 3/10 just because other hyped games turned out badly. Everything about this thread is either inaccurate or flamebait. I mean atleast admit to it...? And not everybody thinks a thread where multiple people get banned and almost every post is either pointless and baseless bashing or a equally pointless defensive posts, is entertaining, interesting or the way threads should go. |
Everything about the ign article suggested that this game needs alot of work. If the camera in a game is atrocious and the combat is "push A" everything, then it is atrocious. If anything, the ign aricle in itself could be considered flaimbait. Thus all the funny GIF's appeared pointing out that this could end up a disaster. And there is reason for concern, considering this game goes gold sometime in october, most likely. If the mods deem this thread unworthy, they could just lock it.








