Vita has over 100 games available to purchase O_o Color me surprised, so why are people saying it needs games to be saved?

[JWeinCom]

iamdeath said:

Wright said:

So we count ports and multiplatforms now as games? I thought that in VGChartz, if it isn't exclusive and only on retail version, it isn't worth mentioning!

HTF are they not GAMES??? Total garbage. I guess all those games on on 360 and ps3 that are multiplatform are not games eithyer? Some people like being able to plat them on a portable.

It's really simple.  If I already have a system capable of playing Rayman Legends, why am I going to buy a Vita so I can play Rayman Legends?  Or Final Fantasy X HD, or Sly Cooper Thieves in Time, or PSASBR, and so on so forth.

The XBox 360 situation is way different.  Both consoles launched within a year of eachother.  So, when people were making the choice of what to buy, they likely didn't have either.  So, if I wanted to play Modern Warfare 4 I had to buy either a PS3 or an XBox 360.  From there, I'd look at exclusives or features I wanted.

The Vita on the other hand is came out something like 7 years after the 360 and 6 years after the PS3.  Most people in the Vita's target audience will have one of those two consoles.  If I have a PS3, why should I shell out 200-250 bucks to play games that I could already play?  If the portability is really that big of a factor to you, then buy a Vita, but for me, and many others judging by sales figures, that isn't the case.