Play4Fun said:
Captain_Tom said:
Zero999 said:
richardhutnik said:
I would also add here that Nintendo is with the second screen, the way that Microsoft is with Kinect 2.0. Both MUST be a must-have differentiator, or they don't win. Off chance of exclusive or something else, but the second screen and Kinect 2.0 are the big deal. Nintendo is only $50 less expensive with inferior hardware. |
bolded: that's not true at all since games are what matter.
bolded 2: even before the price cut announcement, it was always $100 less. 299 with no game or 349 with one game. and of course the hardware is inferior, but not that much.
|
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I cannot believe the the sillyness of some people who honestly think the PS4 isn't atleast 9-12 times stronger than the Wii U. OMG thanks for the laughs guys...
|
PS4 is at least 9 - 12 times more powerful than Wii U, huh?
Care to actually back that up?
|
Dude the information is everywhere I mean come on. Hell I'll oblige you a little. Here is the difference between the GPU's:
-Cores: 320 vs 1152
-Speed: 550MHz vs 800 Mhz
-Bandwidth: 12.8 GB/s vs 176 GB/s
-Manufacturing process: 40nm vs 28nm
(Smaller is better, generally AMD's 28nm architecture in the PS4 is 1.6x faster than the same card manufactured in the 40nm architecture)
The PS4 has 3.6x as many cores running 1.5x faster on a architecture that is 1.6 times faster clock-for-clock. 3.6 x 1.5 x 1.6 = 8.6. Then throw in the fact that the PS4 has 14x the memory bandwidth and can send multiple instructions per cycle and it should be obvious how much the PS4 steamrolls the Wii U.
