By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
g911turbo on 30 August 2013
Edit Thread
Captain_Tom said:
Zero999 said:
richardhutnik said:
I would also add here that Nintendo is with the second screen, the way that Microsoft is with Kinect 2.0. Both MUST be a must-have differentiator, or they don't win. Off chance of exclusive or something else, but the second screen and Kinect 2.0 are the big deal. Nintendo is only $50 less expensive with inferior hardware.

bolded: that's not true at all since games are what matter.

bolded 2: even before the price cut announcement, it was always $100 less. 299 with no game or 349 with one game. and of course the hardware is inferior, but not that much.

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   I cannot believe the the sillyness of some people who honestly think the PS4 isn't atleast 9-12 times stronger than the Wii U.  OMG thanks for the laughs guys...


9-12? WTF. Even from a pure flops perspective, if the Wii U is 300 and the PS4 is 1800... well you don't have to be a math wiz to figure that one out (6x in case you were still doing the math).  And of course, real world will be less.

 

Now granted, even if the PS4 were 3-4x more powerful than the Wii U, that is still a huge amount.  But people aren't going to buy the Wii U to have the graphics leader.  They are going to buy it for a fresh/different experience and/or Nintendo games.