| tbone51 said:
no offense but metacritic does not favor nintendo, you always have reviewers giving a nintendo game a 6-7 while others give it a 9-9.5! It goes both ways sure, but nintendo is hated on to such a great extent. I wouldn't use those #s imo!!! Its good but not always there. |
I'd argue Vita has been suffering a similar problem "oh.. the graphics aren't quite as good as the PS3 version... so we'll dock 2 marks" etc.
But that's fair enough :) but it does support my statement that it has had "critically" the better lineup.
At the end of the day it's all personal preference. For me, Vita is appealing to my tastes more. I have no problem with someone preferring Nintendo titles, and at the end of the day, if you want to play Pokemon or Mario Kart, then all the other games on both systems are completely irrelivant as there's only one place you'll ever be able to play them.
I was more on a bit of a rant because I still see "Vita has no games" and after over 12 months of the same rhetoric it is wearing a bit thin :)
It wasn't meant to be a dig at Nintendo or the 3DS lineup, I have the luxury of having both systems and think they both have some great games. I will agree with you in some regards, CastleVania Lords of Shadow: Mirror of Fate is one of my faveourite handheld releases of the year, and that didn't make it onto the 75+.








