Euphoria14 said:
Anytime a person decides to berate a user rather than attempt to put forth a rebuttal to their claim it speaks volumes. Even more so the person they are trashing offers to put up proof and instead of accepting the challenge that user once again goes into attack mode. Nsanity has no grounds in which to bash Ethomaz in this thread. He only comes off as a poster with an obvious agenda. He needs to take a long hard look in the mirror before he goes ahead and tries to belittle someone due to their character. I have been here for quite a while and one thing I do not see much, if at all is Ethomaz attacking other users. Who knows, maybe i'm wrong. Taking info from another site or not is 100% irrelevent as Ethomaz was actually discusing the subject matter. His posts were non-inflammatory and on topic. |
It had been a large number of hours since I had read the start of the thread, so I just went back to it to make sure that we are both reading the same thing. You are right that Nsanity went after ethomaz directly, but the order of things is a little different than you portray. ethomaz didn't prove his points or offer explanation until after being called into question. And Nsanity hasn't posted(proabably due to the banning) since before ethomaz explained himself.
I agree that ethomaz doesn't make it personal when he does these things and I would guess that he sincerely believes that he is right(and could be). But, as the OP of a thread, if someone commented on most of your threads that you/your thread is "wrong", wouldn't you think that there is an agenda there as well?
Not sure of your point regarding off site sourcing, as I think that is generally a great way to support your ideas. The problem is that I have also followed a number of ethomaz's links and they are similar to using someone's blog to make your point. This whole argument is about the fact that we have no facts for sure and people are saying things as if they were facts. No winners in that argument.
