Pemalite said:
Captain_Tom said:
|
Captain_Tom said:
papamudd said:
I would have thought the cpu speeds would be a lot higher than thus on both consoles... I mean i bought a cheap processor for like 60 bucks that ruins over 3.0ghz |
Does it have 8 cores lol?
|
Even though the consoles have 8 cores, it's still not going to be faster than say... A Core i3 Dual Core.
|
Uh no sh!t. It will be faster than whatver $60 CPU he got. I don't need someone lecturing me on PC parts... No offense...
|
No need to get nasty.
And how do you know it will be faster than his $60 processor? I would place the performance bet on any Intel Dual-core @ 3ghz than an 8 core Jaguar.
AMD hasn't been able to compete with Intel in years, Jaguar is the lowest of lowest in AMD's processor lineup remember.
ethomaz said:
Yes. AMD APUs have the ND clock with the closed multi to the memory clock but you can manualy change at anytime.
The article says because the ND clock is X the CPU clock is 2X... that's false assumption because the multi is not the same for CPU and NB... you can have way different multi for both... so you can have a CPU running at 1.6Ghz and the ND at 900Ghz.
I don't know the Xbone CPU clock but Charlie's assumptions are false.
|
I think you mean "NB" not "ND". :P
But I agree 100%.
superspeedybull said:
CGI-Quality said:
Adinnieken said:
This means the Xbox One's CPU has more Flops than the PS4's does. |
Which will matter very little, if true, since these machines depend mostly on their graphics cards.
|
I remember the PS3 mainly depending on its CPU.
|
Nah. The Cell is very poor performing.
It could do some framebuffer effects, sure, but nothing startling, the real heavy workhorse was the Geforce GPU.
|
What? Developers made it very clear that the PS3's superior CPU made up for its weaker GPU, do you know something that they don't? Please explain.
