Even if it were true that the game was responsible for the kid killing the person, it still goes back to who bought an 8 year old a rated M game.
Just don't understand how rating systems never get brought up in these articles dealing with video game violence. It's always blaming some game or another for a kid killing someone. The game is clearly rated M, so shouldn't we be blaming the parents for buying the game, and/or the video game store for selling a game to a minor.







