The Syrian Civil War Update Thread

[Kasz216]

ArnoldRimmer said:

Kasz216 said:

http://www.hs.fi/english/article/1135240292632

Nothing in her statement was untrue.  It was kept intentionally vague because... that's what good scientists do.

 Your translation seems a bit loaded, as seen as... above. 

That funny, I actually read that particular article just yesterday - because when I read your claim that she never gave in to any pressure, I first tried to find proof for that myself. But all I could find was one short sentence in the (surprisingly short) english Wikipedia article on the Racak incident, saying "She refused to do so." - and the article you linked to is listed as reference, so that's probably where you found that article as well... ;)

But if you've read the article yourself, you know that she never actually claims that she refused and never gave in to any pressure. That sentence in the Wikipedia article is not backed by the reference.

Sure she does, it's the last hing she says in that article.

 

Outside that.  The new UK intellegence more or less shows why the inspectors weren't allowed in until recently.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/1.544214

The truth is, it's likely BOTH sides have been using checmical weapons.... all over the place.

 

I mean it's a civil war.